Wednesday, February 13, 2019
Doug Kelsey is a true neoliberal transit "professional"
That's the dilemma facing Doug Kelsey, general manager of regional transit agency TriMet. Ridership numbers on public transit have stagnated over the past decade even as Portland's population explodes. That's a common problem across major U.S. cities—but also a black eye for a city that wants to combat climate change.
Last March, Kelsey took the helm of a perennially cash-strapped agency (what the hell is that comment doing in there? The last thing Trimet is is cash strapped. They just raised the payroll tax, issued hundreds of billions in bonds, and got a fresh infusion of $70 million from the HR2017 tax grab) that is trying to expand service, help create a lower-carbon future and prepare for a new light-rail line to Tigard. All the while, advocates are demanding that TriMet eliminate paid fares.
Kelsey, a former executive at Shell, Starbucks and the transit agency of Vancouver, B.C.,(a corporatist) hasn't shied from these battles since arriving as TriMet's chief operating officer in 2015. He's championed the closing of downtown MAX stations to speed up commutes, stressed the need for buses to arrive on time, and added 24-hour service to Portland International Airport. (LOL! ya on a but that comes once an hour that required a transfer from another bus that comes once an hour)
Last week, WW asked him what's next.
WW: What's your top priority? Is it ridership?
Doug Kelsey: No.(at least his honest about that, ridership hasn't been important to trimet officials since the abandonment of fareless square) To pick two: Safety is important, customer satisfaction is important. I think on-time performance is really important for those who write the check. (who write the check? reeks of elitism) That's a change I've been trying to make since I got here. Because we were not where we needed to be. We publish the schedule. The customers need to rely on us. If not, they have to subsidize us by putting extra time into their calendar. We've really been working on that.
What's your current on-time percentage?
For probably the first time in our history, the last 30-day rolling average for both bus and train or both was 90 percent. (I don't believe it sorry, I know how they duke the max stats not sure how they do with the bus) When I took over, the whole MAX system for the month was 75 percent, and the bus was at 81. We've been rewiring our processes and our culture to get to this. (by the way I never bought any of this nonsense he's peddling. He's doing what public transportation executives all do. Laying the problems on the personnel operating the vehicles. I think he is bald faced lying)
Is gentrification causing a decline in ridership?
I haven't seen the evidence personally that supports that.(credit on this) I believe this is very similar to what I've seen in other cities in the world. I also personally feel it takes far too long to get through downtown here. We need to speed the systems up so it takes less time to get to where you want to go on your terms. We need to keep MAX moving, and move it faster. Compared to other cities, our dwell times are too long. We stop too long at stations. We need to remove the barriers in traffic. Our buses are only as good as we allow them to get through. (OK makes sense)
The Multnomah Athletic Club and bandleader Thomas Lauderdale look at your idea of removing MAX stations downtown and say it's going to cause more safety hazards. How do you respond?
I would sure be interested to see the evidence of that. Walking is not a bad thing.(unless you can't walk that is) It's actually healthy. And so if you look at other systems, you walk for many, many, many blocks to get to a train station. This one is literally four train-car lengths, not even. You can literally see the trains at the next light. You're literally joined together. It's not even the length of a natural normal platform for any train system. (OK he makes sense sure, but this system was designed this way and to change it now means some people will be hurt. I think a better solution is to add more trains more often)
I was at the last board meeting where people were saying, "Oh, Nike's after this, and Intel." No. I'm the one who raised this stuff. I have feedback I've got: "Why does it take TriMet so long to get me from Gresham to where I work out in Hillsboro?" Because they're spending a lot of time off their life.
Give us an example of a transit agency that's working.
I liked Vienna. (its ridiculous to compare Portland to Vienna) Our modal share, we call it market share, is about 4.2 percent here for transit—which means how many people in the region and how many people are using transit. In Vienna, 39 percent. I came from Vancouver, BC. We were about 14 percent.
Why is Vienna so much more successful?
The Viennas of the world, they do heavy taxation on the cost of driving a car. It's having those policies to go with the investments.(that's called social engineering)
How does a billion-dollar organization like yours think about what autonomous vehicles are going to do? How do you think about decisions that you don't see the results of for five or 10 years?
I see TriMet moving from a transit agency to an integrated mobility agency. (I don't like this at all) We're really well-positioned here to not just be both buses and trains, but also helping to integrate the customer experience.(scary) I don't think the technology exists yet, but down the road we'll be able to share options with the customer: Do you want to take a scooter to TriMet to another scooter to something else? Here's your time, here's your price, confirm which one you want to go. Or do you want to get a Car2Go, or do you want to get an Uber or Lyft?
We become your one-stop shop.(I don't know about this idea at all.Better to be good at what you're supposed to do then get involved with everything else) Today, if you want to do that, you've got to order the Uber thing, you've got to order the scooter, you've got to order the TriMet trip, you've got to order and pay and transact all this yourself? Having the app is different than having it tied into your payment system. That doesn't really exist today. But I actually believe it's quite possible. I think time will prove that.(I think Hong Kong has a version of what he's talking about)
Metro Councilor Juan Carlos Gonzalez made the argument to us recently that TriMet should be free. Is he wrong?
I think there's a whole lot of people who have economic means who can afford to pay.(oh god, there's the neoliberal thinking right here) I don't share that the transit should be free.(There are no transit "professionals" that think transit should be free. The transit professionals are the problem) Firstly, to be free, someone is going to have to write a really big check out of another pocket of the same pair of jeans. So we're a $1.4 billion business. That's a lot of money. We don't discount natural gas bills, we don't discount going to the zoo for free, we don't discount solid waste and recycling.(fares are only 18% of the operating budget, MOST OF THE RIDE IS ALREADY SUBSIDIZED! Lets get rid of the fares and the apparatus that is used to enforce the fares. His thinking might be valid if fares supported the majority of the operational cost. The fact is they don't)
If there are some groups who have a need, then that's fair. We've just introduced one of the most progressive low-income fare programs in North America.(Not progressive enough, the low income pass should be FREE)
But you're trying to increase the percentage of people who use transit. Free transit is a pretty good way to make someone want to get on a train.
We can do that, but where else do you want to pay? There is no free lunch if you're consuming something that costs billions of dollars to produce.(he's clearly gas-lighting this topic, its $200 million dollars which is nothing when looking at Trimet capital projects) This is the cost of a Slurpee, $2.50, for access to a $6 billion system. So I just don't share that belief. (and he is with all the other "professionals" on this topic)
There was an argument on Twitter late last year whether Portlanders' tradition of thanking their drivers as they get off the bus is endearing or really annoying. Where do you stand?
I love it. This city has not lost its community care. And once you lose it, you won't get it back. I came from Vancouver, B.C., where you don't have the same community feel and the craving for connectedness. I'd say fight like heck to preserve it. I'm the one on the back of the bus going, "Thanks!" (LOL! Whatever)