I
have been getting a lot of heat from members about the filing of Preferring of
Charges and so I am putting this post up for those who actually are willing to
listen and investigate the purpose of such a system.
Members have been seeing many comments with statements
like “Preferring of Charges is Black Balling a member” or “It is member causing
harm to another member”. A while back Jon Hunt and the officers at that time
told the membership that Preferring of Charges will cost the membership too much
money and is not a system we should use. Over time members have developed a very
negative feeling about Preferring of Charges that if such a system is used the
member attempting to use it tends to get attacked by members and blocked by
officers. This is what our members are witnessing currently.
If a
member would take a moment to investigate what the purpose of Preferring of
Charges is and why it is in our Constitution then maybe that member would gain a
better understand and not be so harsh towards a member using that system.
Currently the members that have responded to me in a negative manner has
demonstrated that they do not actually understand the Preferring of Charges
process. I would attempt to give reference material so that they can have a
better understand and they refuse to acknowledge that information. When a member
displays such refusal to open a view point to gain a better knowledge then it is
pointless to continue the conversation about that subject with that
member.
To
better understand Preferring of Charges a member must first ask “Why is this in
our constitution and what function does it serve?”
It
is the goal of our union to assure that all members are treated equally and that
all members are entitled to protect themselves from harm. There are times when a
dispute between 2 or more members might take place. When such a dispute takes
place each side has their own personal view and it becomes difficult to resolve.
There is a point when a 3rd party needs to step in and find resolve.
In our union the only process that allows this is the Preferring of Charges.
This system is set up to allow a member to request from the membership an
opportunity for a fair trial. Based from the basic written request members can
approve or deny the request to move forward to a fair trial/investigation. If it
is approved to move forward a committee of 3 members will be formed to hear and
record all the information. This information is provided to the committee from
both sides of the dispute from the members involved. Both members are given a
full and fair opportunity to present their information. The committee then views
the details of the information and determine if there are any violations of our
bylaws or constitution has taken place. If the committee finds that any
violations have taken place then the committee will determine what the correct
actions need to take place. The committee will match the discipline action that
takes place if needed matches the violation or violations that took
place.
Preferring of Charges is only a negative thing towards a
member who has caused harm to another member or the membership. This is the only
process our union has in place to hold members accountable. For those being so
opposed to this system they are not wanting members to be held accountable for
their actions. Without accountability then members and officers tend to not
worry about violating our bylaws or harming members. Until this system is
understood and members become aware that all members are equally held
accountable for any harm they might cause to our members or membership we will
continue to have disputes and members saying it is something we have to
accept.
No comments:
Post a Comment