TriMet management has a track
record of making poor decisions time and time again, while operating the
largest public transit system in Oregon.
In recent years, the Oregon Secretary of State issued a scathing report
about TriMet leadership with recommendations to improve management of the
agencies transit system. Just when
TriMet claimed it had cleaned up its act, another management decision leaves you scratching your head.
Over two months ago, TriMet
received information that one of its transit operators had criminal
convictions, and that he lied about his name and convictions when he applied
for work at TriMet in 1989. It was also
reported that in 2006, the operator, Daniel Martin, had been convicted of
defrauding the federal government of $78,000 for three years while he was
employed by TriMet. TriMet tried to
brush off the allegations about Martin’s criminal past claiming it was a
“union” dispute and chose to do nothing.
But when the Oregonian and
Willamette Week broke stories about Martin’s criminal past, TriMet finally
decided to at least appear as though it was doing something, and is why the
decision they made, has caused a great deal of controversy. Once again the wisdom of TriMet management’s
decision is being questioned. The
firestorm began when TriMet management issued Daniel Martin a notice of
proposed five (5) day suspension without pay and conditions for continued
employment dated June 23, 2015. This is
the punishment TriMet deemed adequate for Martin’s lying about his name and
felony conviction when he applied for work at TriMet.
TriMet confirms that Daniel
Martin lied to Executive Director Shelley Lomax on May 12, 2015 when Martin
claimed that he never went by the name of Daniel Overby and that he was not
convicted of any sex abuse crime in the 1980’s.
TriMet confirms that on May 13, 2015 Martin again lied to Executive
Director Lomax when he denied ever going by the name Daniel Overby. On June 18, 2015 however, Martin admitted to
Powell Garage Transportation Manager Lyle Pereira that his given name was
Daniel Overby and that he changed his name to Daniel Martin in 1993.
Daniel Martin was shown his 1998
TriMet job application and asked why he failed to disclose his real name and why he wrote “no” to the question….have
you ever been convicted of a criminal offense other than a traffic
violation?. Martin said that not
reporting his true name and his felony conviction for Sexual Abuse in the 2nd
degree in 1986 was an oversight. Martin
claims that he had disclosed his name and conviction to TriMet Director of
Transportation Clyde Earl and TriMet Labor Relations Director Mike Savage during
the hiring process in 1998 and that Savage told him “This is the last that we
will speak about this.” This is why
Martin claims he lied to Executive Director Shelley Lomax on May 12 and 13,
2015.
Clyde Earl and Mike Savage left
TriMet many years ago. Did TriMet
management contact both Earl and Savage to confirm that they knowingly covered
up a felony conviction for sexual abuse for a prospective employee, Daniel
Martin? Obviously the answer is that no
one from TriMet management attempted to confirm the veracity of Martin’s claim. And a question for TriMet management would be
“why not?”
Page two – TriMet misguided
decision
Powell Garage Manager Lyle
Pereira claimed in his notice of proposed five (5) day suspension that because
of Martin’s many versions of the truth, it was clear to him that Martin lied
and intended to deceive TriMet about his criminal history. Manager Pereira also wrote that because of
Martin’s lack of credibility, he seriously questioned whether Martin ever had
any conversation with TriMet officials about his convictions during the hiring
process in 1998. Manager Pereira also
acknowledged that because Martin lied on his TriMet application, it may have
prevented him from being hired by TriMet in 1998 because obviously, TriMet
would not hire a new employee to be a transit operator who had a felony
conviction as an adult for sexual abuse.
Because Martin kept his real name
and felony conviction a secret from TriMet, but, because of Martin’s reported
17 years of service and overall job
performance, manager Pereira decided to give Martin a three day unpaid
suspension and permit a convicted sex offender to continue driving bus for
TriMet. Unfortunately, manager Pereira
in citing Martin’s 17 year overall job performance, forgot to mention that
Martin was convicted in 2006 of defrauding the federal government of $78,000
over three years while employed with TriMet.
And of course Martin claimed management was aware of this conviction in
2006, which not surprisingly, TriMet has been unable to find any manager that
would admit to Martin’s disclosure.
The problem for TriMet is they have
terminated a number of employees dating back to 1989 after determining that the
employee made false statements on their application. And one can assume that these employees were
terminated for making false statements, most likely much less severe than
failing to disclose a felony conviction for sexual abuse. TriMet needs to answer the question, “why were
those employees terminated, and what false information did they provide?”. Another problem for TriMet is that now they
are setting precedent by permitting a known sex offender to continue driving a
bus, not to mention an employee who lied to get hired in 1998, and the same
employee convicted for defrauding the federal government as recent as 2006
while employed by TriMet.
So the question begs, has TriMet
really learned from repeated bad management decisions for which they were
criticized in the recent Oregon Secretary of State report?
(Shirley Block-President ATU 757)
"The problem for TriMet is they have terminated a number of employees dating back to 1989 after determining that the employee made false statements on their application. And one can assume that these employees were terminated for making false statements, most likely much less severe than failing to disclose a felony conviction for sexual abuse."
ReplyDeleteHow many, when and who? I am NOT sticking up for Dan BUT I am sick of the "stories" that Joe Rose would be proud of.
The president of our union has a right to be heard
ReplyDeleteDan,must have a hell of a challenge,for Shirley to violate her oath not to hurt a mother member?
ReplyDeleteWhen it comes to union politics anything goes.
ReplyDelete