Trimess

Monday, August 6, 2012

How to fix the Washington Park Shuttle

It strikes me as weird that the 63 and Washington Park Shuttle (also known as the 83) still co-exist. Now that the Washington Park Loop has a number and is officially a bus line (an official sign that TriMet has clearly stopped giving a shit about it) the stupidity of it all is just obvious. Almost every sign is served by both buses with some different routing in the middle. Just compare the two on the system map. It's suffocatingly useless.

I guess you could argue that having the two together provides frequency, and I suppose that could be true, except for a few things. 1) Line 63 runs every 40 minutes midday while line 83 runs every 20 minutes, and most of the time the 63 leaves the Oregon Zoo anywhere between two and five minutes after the 83.  Not useful, now is it?


The only fundamental differences between lines 63 and 83 is that line 83 runs weekends and line 63 runs through the rest of the year. Consider that TriMet's trying to save money, and yet the avoid the only possibly logical 'reconfigurement' in the system. Here's what I think should be done, personally.

1) Eliminate the '83'.

Short version: Run only one bus line through Washington Park.

Long answer: This would essentially be the catalyst to improvements on the 63 itself. Since it's obvious we don't need two routes going the exact same places, we eliminate the one who came along last. Sorry, but the 63 was here first.

2) Reroute the 63

Short version: Consider this routing.

Long version: This new route combines the best of both the lines. From Jeld-Wen Field it would follow line 63's route via Rose Parkway, Kingston North and Fairview. On the return trip to Jeld-Wen Field, it would follow line 83's route via Fairview, Kingston South and Sherwood to the Children's Park.

It would, however, cut off two stops- Line 63's at Kingston and Tichner to Jeld-Wen Field and Line 83's at the Archery Range. A stop at SW Park Place and Sacajawea would have to be moved to SW Sherwood and Lewis&Clark Way.

However, it maintains access to Arlington Heights, Hoyt Arboretum, the Tennis Courts and the Rose Gardens both ways, as well as maintaining the stop just outside the Children's Park on SW Sherwood. The biggest inconvenience would be for the Archery Range; people looking for that stop will find a half-mile's walk ahead of them. However, missing the stops along SW Fairview for that single stop doesn't seem to be worth it, at least in my opinion. Any archers who care to disagree with me?

Also, as a bonus little tidbit, there would be a minor reroute by Jeld-Wen Field via SW King and Burnside. This would provide service to Fred Meyer and other stores along the area instead of following the same routing along 18th twice. There would be a new stop at SW King Avenue at Taylor Northbound, and the line would serve line 20 stops at W 21st and 20th, while forgoing Eastbound stops at SW Salmon at 20th and 19th (which would be served Westbound.) This is entirely expendable, just an extra little idea.

3) Merge the schedules

To make a long point brief, I'll put it in list form.

3a) Reinstate Weekend Service between the off-peak seasons at current line 63 weekday levels. No matter the season, the most likely day someone would visit Washington Park are in fact weekends.

3b) Run line 63 every forty minutes between 6am and 6pm during off-peak season same as usual.

3c) During the peak season, between each forty minute trip, add one halfway between them between ten and six to create line 83 levels of service.
Example: (1:35pm, 1:55pm, 2:15pm, 2:35pm, 2:55pm).

This would tidy up the schedule as well as give weekend service throughout the rest of the year, which would be covered by money saved from running one less line during the summer.

4) Some good old-fashioned TriMet marketing.

Take the TriMet approach: spin a new web from an old thread! Make it seem like there's a ton more when there really isn't. I can see it now.

Ride the all-year Washington Park Shuttle
Now running 365 days a year all day, take the new and improved Washington Park Shuttle to any of your destinations anywhere between Jeld-Wen Field and the Oregon Zoo! See where it takes you?

See? You don't even have to mention that all the buses are mirthless 1900s with no Air Conditioning; there's slightly less service than before and aside from Weekend Service and slight reroute it's not any different than it was before. I'm not kidding; say what you want about TriMet, but they know how to boast and lie.

So that's my take on it. No matter what, something has to be done about this clunky overlap.

~Cameron

10 comments:

EngineerScotty said...

I still like my idea on PT to combine the Washington Park routes with the 58, and have a through route from Beaverton TC, up Canyon Road to Sylvan, to the zoo and down through the park to Jeld-Wen Field, possibly continuing to the transit mall.

Would probably be a bit more reliable route than running the 58 on the freeway, where it frequently gets stuck in traffic.

Cameron Johnson said...

However, there would be no way a 40 footer bus could feasibly move through Washington Park. A thirty footer just barely fits. I can see why a reroute would be useful on line 58, though; a non-express shouldn't run on an undependable freeway.

I wonder of Broadway Drive and Patton Rd would work...

Al M said...

58 doesn't really need a 40 footer except when school gets out

John St Clair said...

A 40 footer was all the 63 got back before MAX went in. Can't have them now though because of the 18 offline.

John St Clair said...

Good points though. The reasoning for cutting redundant service doesn't seem to apply to the 63/83. I don't agree on the 58 though. The two runs do different things. While the 63 meanders through the park and Arlington Heights, the 58 is almost an express run once you leave 87th and Canyon. The fix for the traffic would be to run the 58 up the middle lane to 10th and then connectg to Max downtown by looping it by Pioneer Square. Just a couple of thoughts.

Erik H. said...

I'd almost like to know why these buses even exist (both 63 and 83) and why TriMet, not the City of Portland, is providing the service.

The route is mostly for the benefit of the park, rather than taxpaying residents and businesses. Since Washington Park is already served with a MAX station, and these buses are among the least productive routes in TriMet's network - why not eliminate it? If the City wants to continue service, it can use one of the Water Bureau's limo buses (Manufactured by a company called Krystal Koach, well known for its limousines) to provide the service. (Since, the buses do skirt the Water Bureau's facilities, it would also be logical.)

Cameron Johnson said...

Actually, during the summer, line 83 is almost always packed. I use it a lot, as does my little sister when I take her with me.

Cameron Johnson said...

Besides, TriMet monopolized pretty much all transit. They'd probably pitch a fit if the City tried providing it. Maybe if they built a streetcar out there, TriMet would be a-okee with it.

John St Clair said...

@Erik, I drive the 63 one day a week and have on and off for 12 years. It seems counter to budget rationale but the 63 has a value to the City (and therefore to TriMet) that can't be measured on a ledger.
First it is the only Transit connection between MAX and Japanese Gardens other than the Zoo Train in the off season. I suppose Portland could provide the service but then they have a transit district that's supposed to do that
Second MAX serves one small area of Washington Park pretty well...the rest and I would say most visited part of the park by tourists is a good half hour to 45 min. hike away from MAX depending on what kind of shape you're in.
Last I have talked to people who said that they made a decision to move to Portland (thus enlarging the city's tax base) after taking a trip on the 63/83.
This is not normal talk from a guy who pretty much sticks to the conservative free market side of things economically so I had to think hard about reasons to justify a run I love driving. But there they are. :-)

Jason McHuff said...

Second MAX serves one small area of Washington Park pretty well...the rest and I would say most visited part of the park by tourists is a good half hour to 45 min. hike away from MAX depending on what kind of shape you're in.

Exactly. The whole point (originally) of the Washington Park Shuttle was to get people AROUND the park, to places BEYOND the MAX station.

Overall, what I would do is simply cancel the 63 and have the 83 run every day of the year, with a reduced, 1-bus schedule during the off season (remember, park-goers often aren't on a strict schedule). Run it during the AM rush hour, with maybe a routing tailored to commuters. In addition, have it turn around at 18th and Salmon instead of Couch to reduce the trip time and increase the frequency.