Friday, November 29, 2013


 We are continuing our investigation into the facts of Aldstadt vs Jensen. In this segment we will examine  this piece of evidence below:

In this odd piece of the evidence we find that Ms Aldstadt had blocked Lane from her phone. 
Which of course leads me to the next question, why did she unblock him?
There is only one answer to that question that I can think of, in hopes  to entrap him into this phony criminal case

In criminal law, entrapment is when a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit an offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely to commit.[1] It is a type of conduct that is generally frowned upon, and thus in many jurisdictions is a possible defense against criminal liability.
Depending on the law in the jurisdiction, the prosecution may be required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was not entrapped or the defendant may be required to prove that they were entrapped as an affirmative defense.
Sting operations are fraught with ethical concerns over whether they constitute entrapment.


No comments: