The legislature approved TriMet’s request, and the payroll tax rate went up every January for ten straight years. By the end of 2014, TriMet had received $34.4 million in new payroll tax revenues attributable to rate increases. Yet during that same decade, the miles of transit service offered to patrons actually dropped by 14%, while the hours of service declined by 5%.
Like a magic show, TriMet tried to distract the audience by pointing to grand celebrations for the opening of the WES commuter rail line and the Green MAX line, both of which opened in 2009. But overall service levels were reduced five times in six years, the opposite of what was promised in 2003.
TriMet’s proposed budget for 2015-16 was released last week. It calls for “expanding service through the opening of the Portland-Milwaukie light rail line.” Once again, all the attention will be on new trains, while total service levels will still be far below the levels we had in 2003.
State legislators should be asking TriMet where all the money went. But sadly, no one in Salem cares about results.
Original Here
6 comments:
For starters, I don't think he mentions that the economy hasn't gone as planned and has affected things. Even with the tax rate increase, payroll tax revenues were lower than in 2010 than in 2009. Wage increases, new jobs, etc usually cause an increase even with the same rate.
Also, according to the proposed budget, vehicle hours are down only 3.5% and that does not fully include service restorations this and next fiscal years.
And raw vehicle miles and hours aren't necessarily a good comparison. For example, multiple bus lines no longer travel up the Portland Mall like they used to, but the rerouting of the Yellow Line as well as the addition of the Green Line has kept capacity and service.
While the tax rate increased, the money didn't come in because of the recession. Typical cascade policy crap.
He's talking about the percentage increase in the tax, which was authorized by the legislature which further was supposed to go to expansion of the current system.
Well it didn't do that and he proves it.
You might not like John Charles but the facts speak for themself
That's complete bullshit Jason
What is exactly?
He's talking about the percentage increase in the tax
Yes he is. However, a percentage increase is useless if the amount that is taxed does not increase. Look at page 260 of the proposed budget and compare year 2009 with year 2010. The rate was increased but the revenue went down (when it should be rising in the first place due to job and wage increases).
You have to read what CP says very carefully. They said (from your text above):
"the payroll tax rate went up every January for ten straight years."
Post a Comment