So according to this version of democracy, "the public are ignorant and
meddlesome outsiders. They have to be put in their place. Decisions
must be in the hands of an intelligent minority of responsible men, who
have to be protected from the trampling and roar of the bewildered
herd". The herd has a function, as it's called. They're supposed to lend
their weight every few years, to a choice among the responsible men.
But apart from that, their function is to be "spectators, not
participants in action" - and it's for their own good. Because as the
founder of liberal political science pointed out, we should not succumb
to “democratic dogmatisms about people being the best judges of their
own interest". They're not. We're the best judges, so it would be
irresponsible to let them make choices just as it would be irresponsible
to let a three-year-old run into the street. Attitudes and opinions
therefore have to be controlled for the benefit of those you are
controlling. It's necessary to "regiment their minds"
Well, another important feature of RECD is that the public must be kept
in the dark about what is happening to them. The "herd" must remain
"bewildered". The reasons were explained lucidly by the professor of the
science of government at Harvard - that's the official name - another
respected liberal figure, Samuel Huntington. As he pointed out, "power
remains strong when it remains in the dark. Exposed to sunlight, it
begins to evaporate"
Chomsky: The U.S. Behaves Nothing Like a Democracy, But You'll Never Hear About It in Our 'Free Press' | Alternet
No comments:
Post a Comment