Here's a Google Street View image of the location where the car turned into the path of a WES train, from almost precisely the exact location (since the automobile was not in the left turn lane). As one can see, there are four separate signals governing the left turn movement - two railroad crossing signals both near and far side, and two left turn signals.
I will agree, this is not a standard installation so a motorist unfamiliar with the area might be a little confused here. But I don't see it as a "problem" that needs to be fixed. Just prior to the intersection is a warning sign advising that there is an intersection with a railroad crossing:
Placing a standard railroad signal here would be difficult, because the through lane on Lombard southbound is not affected by the railroad track. So a traffic island would need to be constructed to place a standard railroad crossing/gate just for the left turn lane. And such signals are pretty rare if they exist at all. I think the only real "improvement" would be to install a left turn signal with the near-side signal (where the railroad wig-wag signal is), but that would require installing a longer span arm and possibly reduce clearance over the railroad track.
Ultimately, this was just a case of a confused motorist who didn't know where they were going - at some point, no amount of warning devices, signals, signs, etc. will stop stupid people. It's just like people who drive through lowered railroad gates. And ultimately it was a very minor collision. Ironically - it was the City of Beaverton that paid millions of dollars in the early 1980s to re-route the Oregon Electric mainline away from downtown and created the St. Marys lead to the west of town, eliminating one of two railroad tracks through downtown...only to essentially rebuild it all.
10 comments:
This is excellent Erik thanks!
It is decent.
But this is a better view of what the motorist was looking at when they slowed (but not stopped) at about 0:23 into the video.
I was going to suggest removing the near-side signal mast and attaching the railroad signal and the left turn signal to the far side one, but the problem is that WES starts entering the street before the intersection and traffic needs to be held further back instead of encouraged to advance right up to the intersection.
An ideal solution would be to remove the far side traffic signal mast and extend the one from the other side of the street (which already has the left turn signal on it) to cover the whole street.
Also at 0:23 in the video, the other car uses the bike lane to pass.
eliminating one of two railroad tracks through downtown...only to essentially rebuild it all.
The new one does take a very different path, but the divergence is in the same place.
That shot if from Lombard Jason, not TV Highway
The crash didn't happen at TV Highway
The car was on TV Hwy not Lombard and that is a picture of Lombard
No, the car was on Lombard. Watch the video. And TV Highway doesn't even cross Lombard.
With all due respect to the discussion about redesigning the signaling . . .
Anyone who manages to drive into a moving train is a dumbass. It's big, it's heavy, it rides on tracks. If I see blinking red lights around me, I'm going to make damn sure there's no train within half a mile of me before I move. From the video, there is zero reason why the driver of that SUV should NOT have seen the train coming.
There are times when I firmly believe in survival of the fittest, and this is one of them. Is the intesection designed poorly? Maybe. Perhaps. The signaling could probably be better. Had the SUV stopped? Yes. Did the driver have a clear line of sight out the driver's window? Absolutely. I don't care if I have a green light or not -- I check to make sure it's clear. That's called defensive driving. Many people seem to practice offensive driving today. (Take that as you wish.)
And TV Highway doesn't even cross Lombard.
The Oregon Department of Transportation would beg to differ with you.
The Tualatin Valley Highway ("TV" Highway) begins at U.S. 26 (the Sunset Highway) at Sylvan, and ends at Oregon 99W east of McMinnville.
http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TDATA/tsm/docs/TVT_2011.pdf (scroll to Tualatin Valley Highway no. 29)
But this is a better view of what the motorist was looking at when they slowed (but not stopped) at about 0:23 into the video.
Are you suggesting that the motorist was incapable of rotating his or her head, and was incapable of moving their eyes, so that they actually suffered from a medical condition that forced them to only look straight ahead?
I was referring to TV Highway the street name, where it is actually used on purpose public signs. Most people think of the eastern part as Canyon Road.
And to answer your question, I was suggesting that possibly saw (just) the green signals straight ahead and thought it was clear to turn.
Post a Comment