Trimess

Trimess
FOLLOW THE TWITTER FEED FOR UPDATES

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Let's examine the evidence in ME vs MCFARLANE

This is the case information
THE CASE NUMBER
And this is the order, which TRIMET HAS COMPLETELY IGNORED AS IF IT NEVER HAPPENED
THE ORDER-WHICH TRIMET HAS IGNORED
So what does this all mean. Because of Trimet's actions directly related to Mcfarlanes order I have sustained personal losses and want to recover these losses in court.
The arbitrator chose Trimet's offer WHICH WAS ILLEGAL and this court said so.
The arbitrator said as much in his ruling, Mcfarlane is lying to everyone and getting away with it.

No comments: