Lane thought he was abiding by the court order when he made the podcast and he had every reason to think that. Below is a copy of the original release document which states he must do two things, attempt no contact with Aldstadt and remove a blog post. He abided by both restrictions but was arrested anyway
After the kangaroo court proceeding (which was allowed to proceed even though his lawyer was not there) had ended he was given an updated copy of the restrictions. Now logical people would think all of this would have been spelled out correctly the first time. But then again logical people aren't trying to set up other people for false imprisonment
1 comment:
This is pretty outrageous! In other words, they rearrested him the other day for violating terms of release that they didn't actually spell out in the release!
But because they forgot to write down the additional restrictions, Lane was supposed to anticipate their thoughts and obey what the court might really mean?
George Orwell would have really loved this...
Post a Comment